The Threats of Ai and Disinformation in Times of Global Crises
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.69526/bir.v3i4.394Keywords:
Artificial Intelligence, Disinformation, Deep-fakes, Global Crises, Information Disorder, Digital PropagandaAbstract
This study aims to investigate the threats posed by artificial intelligence (AI)-enabled disinformation during global crises, including pandemics, geopolitical conflicts, and climate emergencies. While prior research has examined AI’s role in enhancing information processing and communication, few studies have critically analyzed how AI tools such as deep-fakes, NLP-generated fake news, and social media bots are systematically weaponized to distort facts and manipulate public perception at scale. This research addresses that gap by offering a thematic and case-based analysis of AI-driven disinformation campaigns during crisis periods. Using a qualitative descriptive design, this study employs library research and digital observation methods to analyze a variety of sources—academic publications, digital media artifacts, and case studies—related to disinformation. Data were collected through purposive sampling of literature and observed disinformation trends on social platforms. The data were analyzed thematically to classify the types of AI-assisted disinformation and examine their social, political, and psychological impacts. The results reveal that AI technologies significantly amplify the scale, speed, and believability of disinformation. Deep-fake content was found to influence public opinion by mimicking credible figures, while NLP-generated fake news exploits confirmation bias to spread ideologically charged narratives. Meanwhile, AI bots disrupt online discourse by creating echo chambers and undermining trust in public institutions. These dynamics were particularly evident in the COVID-19 pandemic, the Russia-Ukraine conflict, and climate change denial movements. The novelty of this study lies in its integrated approach to mapping AI-powered disinformation as both a technological and socio-political phenomenon. It proposes a tripartite mitigation framework involving technological detection systems, regulatory policy interventions, and media literacy campaigns to enhance societal resilience. This research contributes to the growing discourse on information disorder by offering a critical lens on how AI can both exacerbate and help solve the global crisis of trust and truth.
References
L. Alexander and G. Elsrakbi, “Sharing is believing: How syrian digital propaganda images become re-inscribed as heroes,” in Technoetic Arts, Intellect Ltd., 2013, pp. 239–252. doi: https://doi.org/10.1386/tear.11.3.239_1.
C. Bjola, “The ethics of countering digital propaganda,” Ethics Int. Aff., vol. 32, no. 3, pp. 305–315, 2018, doi: https://doi.org/10.1017/S0892679418000436.
S. Lohmann, “Digital propaganda-Russia or the kid next door?,” in Redesigning Organizations: Concepts for the Connected Society, American Institute for Contemporary German Studies, Johns Hopkins University, Washington, DC, United States: Springer International Publishing, 2019, pp. 255–265. doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-27957-8_19.
C. Sparkes-Vian, “Digital Propaganda: The Tyranny of Ignorance,” Crit. Sociol., vol. 45, no. 3, pp. 393–409, 2019, doi: https://doi.org/10.1177/0896920517754241.
T. A. Neyazi, “Digital propaganda, political bots and polarized politics in India,” Asian J. Commun., vol. 30, no. 1, pp. 39–57, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/01292986.2019.1699938.
M. Boler and E. Davis, “Digital propaganda and emotional micro-targeting: Interview with jonathan albright, carole cadwalladr, paolo gerbaudo, and tamsin shaw,” in Affective Politics of Digital Media: Propaganda by Other Means, University of California, Santa Cruz, United States: Taylor and Francis, 2020, pp. 330–350. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85092394663&partnerID=40&md5=782c8fc811b928dfc36362669bc9d311
C. Bjola and K. Papadakis, “Digital propaganda, counterpublics and the disruption of the public sphere: the Finnish approach to building digital resilience,” Cambridge Rev. Int. Aff., vol. 33, no. 5, pp. 638–666, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/09557571.2019.1704221.
C. Bjola, “Digital propaganda as symbolic convergence: The case of Russian ads during the 2016 US presidential election,” in Research Handbook on Political Propaganda, University of Oxford, Oxford Digital Diplomacy Research Group, United Kingdom: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2021, pp. 80–97. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906424.00013.
C. Bjola and K. Papadakis, “Digital propaganda, counterpublics, and the disruption of the public sphere: The finnish approach to building digital resilience,” in The World Information War: Western Resilience, Campaigning, and Cognitive Effects, Diplomatic studies, University of Oxford, United Kingdom: Taylor and Francis, 2021, pp. 186–213. doi: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003046905-15.
T. C. Chen, “Xi Jinping’s grand strategy for digital propaganda,” in Research Handbook on Political Propaganda, Institute of Political Science, National Sun Yat-sen University, Taiwan: Edward Elgar Publishing Ltd., 2021, pp. 127–142. doi: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789906424.00016.
S. C. Woolley, “DIGITAL PROPAGANDA: THE POWER OF INFLUENCERS,” J. Democr., vol. 33, no. 3, pp. 115–129, 2022, doi: https://doi.org/10.1353/jod.2022.0027.
G. Cardile, “The threat of AI-driven cyber attacks on space systems,” in Proceedings of the International Astronautical Congress, IAC, International Astronautical Federation, IAF, 2023. [Online]. Available: https://www.scopus.com/inward/record.uri?eid=2-s2.0-85187977282&partnerID=40&md5=fe454003aec06f475b1896914c3b89fa
G. Baioud and C. Khuanuud, “Yearning for a homogeneous Chinese nation: digital propaganda campaigns after the 2020 protest in Inner Mongolia,” Centr. Asian Surv., vol. 42, no. 2, pp. 319–340, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/02634937.2022.2131736.
C. Zhang, D. Zhang, and H. L. Shao, “The softening of Chinese digital propaganda: Evidence from the People’s Daily Weibo account during the pandemic,” Front. Psychol., vol. 14, 2023, doi: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2023.1049671.
M. G. Burguillos and E. S. Robles, “Opportunities from the social economy in the fight against the threats of AI,” Rev. CIDOB d’Afers Int., no. 138, pp. 145–169, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.24241/rcai.2024.138.3.145.
S. J. Diller, L.-C. Stenzel, and J. Passmore, “The coach bots are coming: exploring global coaches’ attitudes and responses to the threat of AI coaching,” Hum. Resour. Dev. Int., vol. 27, no. 4, pp. 597–621, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1080/13678868.2024.2375934.
C. Lin, “Digital propaganda is not simply propaganda in digital garb: toward an expanded theory of propaganda,” Commun. Theory, vol. 34, no. 4, pp. 205–215, 2024, doi: 1 https://doi.org/0.1093/ct/qtae017.
K. Dommett and T. Stafford, “The truth about digital propaganda,” New Sci., vol. 263, no. 3506, pp. 36–39, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0262-4079(24)01571-9.
R. Marigliano, L. H. X. Ng, and K. M. Carley, “Analyzing digital propaganda and conflict rhetoric: a study on Russia’s bot-driven campaigns and counter-narratives during the Ukraine crisis,” Soc. Netw. Anal. Min., vol. 14, no. 1, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.1007/s13278-024-01322-w.
F. Traylor, “The threat of AI chatbot responses to crowdsourced open-ended survey questions,” Energy Res. Soc. Sci., vol. 119, 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.erss.2024.103857.
A. Asnawiyah, A. Wahid, N. Amri, and M. H. Husni, “PREVENTION OF INFERIORITY COMPLEX ATTITUDES ACCORDING TO THE QUR’AN,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 3, no. 2, pp. 234–280, Aug. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v3i2.8413.
M. R. R. Siyamto, A. Rhain, M. Ilham, and S. Wakit, “Public Reception of Qur’an Calligraphy at the Iska Mayang Grand Mosque in Sukoharjo,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 23–40, Dec. 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7866.
D. D. Lumah, N. Nasrullah, B. A. Salsabila, and F. Almaliki, “How Did Imam At-Thabari’s Interpretation with Tafsir bil Ma’tsur Style Influence Qur’anic Exegesis and Ulama During the Abbasid Dynasty Era?,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 151–170, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7948.
G. Sereikaite Motiejune, “Polygamy in Islam: A Study on Its Religious Justifications and Empowerment of Women Within Islamic Teachings,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 59–74, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.6948.
T. Yusuf, “Nonverbal Communication and its Effects on Human Relations: An Analysis from Surah Luqman,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 139–150, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.6442.
D. Rahmawati, M. S. Abouzeid, A. Nirwana AN, S. Hidayat, and A. Rhain, “Investigating Online Quran Interpretation: Methods and Sources on Muslimah.or.id and its Contribution to Online Islamic Discourse,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 75–90, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7322.
S. Shofaussamawati, A. Nikmah, and M. A. Azkiya, “Reading of Jasser Auda’s System Theory in the Law Verse on Women and Mosques,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 91–108, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7954.
M. Elbanna, M. F. Wadi, A. M. Radiamoda, Y. Matsuyama, and M. H. Bin Ishak, “A Bibliometric Analysis of Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs) Through the Lens of Maqasid Shariah Tafsir,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 1–22, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7360.
A. N. Hanifah, B. Al Sowaidi, and A. Nirwana AN, “Reinterpretation of the Words Falyanzur and Tha’am in Qs ’Abasa Verse 24 to Build Public Nutrition Awareness,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 109–124, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7321.
S. Aisyah and M. I. Mahbub, “Human Fingerprint Study from Zaqlul An-Najjar’s Perspective with the STIFIn Method: Study of the Meaning of Banan in the Qur’an,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 171–198, Feb. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.8440.
A. Al Kausar, “The Qur’an for All: A Historical Analysis of Bengali Translations and Tafsir,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 125–138, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.7389.
H. P. Ahmad, “Thematic and Structural Unity of Q 79 (al-Nazi’at): An Intratextual and Intertextual Analysis,” QiST J. Quran Tafseer Stud., vol. 4, no. 1, pp. 41–58, Jan. 2025, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/qist.v4i1.6698.
C. Martel, G. Pennycook, and D. G. Rand, “Reliance on emotion promotes belief in fake news,” Cogn. Res. Princ. Implic., vol. 5, no. 1, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.1186/s41235-020-00252-3.
C. M. Pulido, L. Ruiz-Eugenio, G. Redondo-Sama, and B. Villarejo-Carballido, “A new application of social impact in social media for overcoming fake news in health,” Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health, vol. 17, no. 7, 2020, doi: https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17072430.
Z. Z. Sutrisno, M. Z. Azani, and B. S. S. Dahlan, “Digital Platform Mapping: Moslem Family Education Content on Social Media,” Iseedu J. Islam. Educ. Thoughts Pract., vol. 8, no. 2, pp. 220–230, 2024, doi: https://doi.org/10.23917/iseedu.v8i2.9004.
Chesney, R., & Citron, D. (2019). Deepfakes and the New Disinformation War: The Coming Age of Post-Truth Geopolitics. Foreign Affairs, 98(1), 147-155.
DiResta, R. (2018). The Anatomy of a Disinformation Campaign. Harvard Kennedy School Review, 18, 34-39.
Frenkel, S., Alba, D., & Zhong, R. (2020). Surge of Virus Misinformation Stumps Facebook and Twitter. The New York Times. Retrieved from https://www.nytimes.com
Vosoughi, S., Roy, D., & Aral, S. (2018). The Spread of True and False News Online. Science, 359(6380), 1146-1151.
Wardle, C., & Derakhshan, H. (2017). Information Disorder: Toward an Interdisciplinary Framework for Research and Policy Making. Council of Europe Report. Retrieved from https://www.coe.int

Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2025 Mukhtar Imam (Author)

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.